Global sea level rose faster in the 20th century than in
any of the 27 previous centuries, according to a Rutgers University-led study
published today.
Moreover, without global warming, global sea level would
have risen by less than half the observed 20th century increase and might even
have fallen.
Instead, global sea level rose by about 14 centimeters,
or 5.5 inches, from 1900 to 2000. That's a substantial increase, especially for
vulnerable, low-lying coastal areas.
"The 20th century rise was extraordinary in the
context of the last three millennia - and the rise over the last two decades
has been even faster," said Robert Kopp, the lead author and an associate
professor in Rutgers' Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
The study, published in Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, used a new statistical approach developed over the last
two and a half years by Kopp, his postdoctoral associates Carling Hay and Eric
Morrow, and Jerry Mitrovica, a professor at Harvard University.
"No local record measures global sea level,"
Kopp said. "Each measures sea level at a particular location, where it is
buffeted by a variety of processes that cause it to differ from the global
mean. The statistical challenge is to pull out the global signal. That's what
our statistical approach allows us to do."
Notably, the study found that global sea level declined
by about 8 centimeters [3 inches] from 1000 to 1400, a period when the planet
cooled by about 0.2 degrees Celsius [0.4 degrees Fahrenheit].
"It is striking that we see this sea-level change
associated with this slight global cooling," Kopp said. By comparison,
global average temperature today is about 1 degrees Celsius [1.8 degrees
Fahrenheit] higher than it was in the late 19th century.
A statistical analysis can only be as good as the data
it's built upon. For this study, a team led by Andrew Kemp, an assistant
professor of earth and ocean sciences at Tufts University, and Benjamin Horton,
a professor in Rutgers' Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, compiled a
new database of geological sea-level indicators from marshes, coral atolls and
archaeological sites that spanned the last 3,000 years.
The database included records from 24 locations around
the world. Many of the records came from the field work of Kemp, Horton, or
team members Roland Gehrels of the University of York in the United Kingdom and
Jeffrey Donnelly of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. The analysis also
tapped 66 tide-gauge records from the last 300 years.
"Scenarios of future rise depend upon our
understanding of the response of sea level to climate changes," Horton
said. "Accurate estimates of sea-level variability during the past 3,000
years provide a context for such projections."
Based on this relationship, the study found that, without
global warming, 20th century global sea-level change would very likely have
been between a decrease of 3 centimeters [1.2 inches] and a rise of 7
centimeters [2.8 inches].
A companion report finds that, without the global
warming-induced component of sea-level rise, more than half of the 8,000
coastal nuisance floods observed at studied U.S. tide gauge sites since 1950
would not have occurred. The Climate Central report, led by Benjamin Strauss
and co-authored by Kopp, Bittermann, and William Sweet of NOAA, was also
published today.
The Kopp-led study also found that it's very likely that
global sea level will rise by 1.7 to 4.3 feet in the 21st century if the world
continues to rely heavily upon fossil fuels. Phasing out fossil fuels will
reduce the very likely rise to between 0.8 and 2.0 feet.
Scientists at the following institutions contributed to
the study: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University;
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany; Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution; University of York in the United Kingdom; and
Harvard University. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation,
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the New Jersey Sea Grant
Consortium, the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Group, the
U.K. National Environmental Research Council, the Royal Society, and Harvard
University.
No comments:
Post a Comment